Language: Português (BR) · Español
Comparing athletes only makes sense with the same division and category filters. Evolution only makes sense with a consistent historical series. This page brings the two concepts together and points you to the right tools.
comparativo atletas tiro prático evolução atleta IPSC comparar hit factor gráfico radar análise desempenho
Public form with Plotly on the home page.
Jump straight to import tools and related guides.
The classic flow: select race, division and up to four athletes; generate PSBL graphs and tables. On the website, use /comparacao (main form). In the IPSC guide, /comparativo-atletas-ipsc and /como-comparar-atletas-ipsc-5-passos detail the step-by-step instructions in the IM hub.
Filters by year, discipline and division feed into trend graphs — useful for seeing if changing equipment or training has changed average hit factor. APIs: /get_athletes_for_evolution, /generate_evolution_graph. Educational content at /analise-ipsc.
The radar graph summarizes dimensions (HF average, best worst track, consistency). Time×points correlation helps you see if you buy a score with risk. Pages: /grafico-radar-ipsc and /analise-correlacao-ipsc.
After comparing, open /details-performance-atleta-ipsc for adaptive benchmarking and reading the performance classification in the chosen test.
A test answers “how I was today”; evolution crosses several stages at https://im.scoring.services/atleta Combine with /ranking-elo-ipsc for level trending.
Performance graphs and ELO ranking to track progress between tests.
Performance graphs and ELO ranking to track progress between tests.
Performance graphs and ELO ranking to track progress between tests.
Performance graphs and ELO ranking to track progress between tests.
Direct links to im.scoring.services — match list, import, athlete search, editors, and more.
Each card opens a dedicated area of the import and analysis hub.