# IPSC comparative graphs — analyze rivals like PractiScore Competitor

> Compare up to 4 athletes per imported match (WinMSS or .psc): hit factor, time and points per stage. Cross-division mode, free in the browser — worldwide.

Resumo (pt-BR): **Gráficos comparativos IPSC — analise rivais como PractiScore Competitor**. Compare até 4 atletas por prova importada (WinMSS ou .psc): hit factor, tempo e pontos por pista. Modo cross-division, grátis no navegador — mundial.

This file: https://scoring.services/pages/comparative-graphs.md
HTML page: https://scoring.services/pages/comparative-graphs (pt-BR), https://scoring.services/pages/comparative-graphs?lang=en, https://scoring.services/pages/comparative-graphs?lang=es
Open the tool: [View documentation](https://scoring.services/docs#graficos-comparativos)

Visualize stage-by-stage performance and compare rivals in the same match — like the PractiScore Competitor app, but in your browser, after importing .psc or WinMSS .cab from any country. Ideal to see where you gained or lost ground in the division.

## Graphs in action

- ![Athlete selection for division comparison](https://scoring.services/static/img/pages/prints/match_graph_01.png)
- ![Hit factor by stage chart for up to 4 athletes](https://scoring.services/static/img/pages/prints/match_graph_02.png)
- ![Hit factor vs division best and comparative radar profile](https://scoring.services/static/img/pages/prints/match_graph_03.png)
- ![Detailed per-stage tables with time, points and hit factor](https://scoring.services/static/img/pages/prints/match_graph_04.png)
- ![Overall summary of selected athletes with Match Editor shortcut](https://scoring.services/static/img/pages/prints/match_graph_05.png)

## Features

- Select up to 4 athletes in one view
- Hit factor, time and points per stage in bars or lines
- Radar profile and comparison vs division best
- Detailed tables and per-stage goal projection
- Compare athletes across divisions (cross-division)
- Works on matches imported via WinMSS (.cab) or PractiScore (.psc) — any region
- Shareable link — squad and federation open without installing an app

## References

- [Docs — Graphs](https://scoring.services/docs#graficos-comparativos)
- [Docs — Radar chart](https://scoring.services/docs#grafico-radar)
- [Match hub](https://scoring.services/pages/match-hub.md)
- [Analyze competitors (web)](https://scoring.services/pages/practiscore-competitor-web.md)

## Step 1: open the correct match

Access the list of matches, select the stage and enter the hub. This starting point ensures that all data used in the analysis is from the same competition.

## Step 2: Apply filters before comparing

Filter by division and category to avoid distorted comparisons. This step improves the quality of the diagnosis from the beginning.

## Step 3: select up to 4 athletes in the comparison

In the comparative graphics module, choose the athletes and see hit factor, time and points per stage. Focus on the most consistent differences, not just isolated peaks.

## Step 4: validate profile on the radar chart

Use the radar to understand competitive profile: HF average, best and worst stage, general consistency. It helps to see performance patterns in a single view.

## Step 5: close with time x points correlation

Analyze the correlation to decide training priority: accelerate while maintaining points, or adjust precision before increasing pace. This closure transforms comparison into a technical plan.

## Summary of the 5 steps (with links)

1) Choose match in the IM hub 2) Filter division 3) Select athletes 4) Open graphs 5) Export insights — direct shortcut: /tools. Theory: /pages/comparative-graphs.

## Frequently asked questions

### How many athletes can I compare?

Up to 4 athletes simultaneously in the same view per match.

### Do I need the PractiScore Competitor app?

Not to compare on the web. Import PractiScore (.psc), WinMSS (.cab) or a ShootingHouse URL at /import and use hub charts — free in the browser. The Competitor app is a paid offline option on iPhone.

### Is this flow suitable for beginners?

Yes. The step-by-step guide was designed for practical use, even without advanced knowledge of statistics.

### What is the most common error in comparison?

Compare athletes without filtering division and category. This reduces the quality of the conclusion.

### How to turn comparison into training?

Identify 1 to 2 recurring bottlenecks and stage progress by match, using the same metrics.

### Do I need to login to check match results?

Most IPSC consultations and guidance are public. Import and management flows use login.scoring.services; what is open without registration is in /pages/ipsc-results.

### Can I share the already filtered comparison?

Yes. After choosing division and athletes, copy the link from the address bar: it maintains the filters, so whoever opens it sees the same comparison. Form shortcut: /tools.

## Related guides

- [IPSC match hub — results, graphs, overall & heatmaps](https://scoring.services/pages/match-hub.md)
- [Analyze IPSC rivals on the web — PractiScore Competitor alternative](https://scoring.services/pages/practiscore-competitor-web.md)
- [Import WinMSS or PractiScore match — full IPSC stats worldwide](https://scoring.services/pages/import-match.md)
- [IPSC overall results & rankings — view scores online](https://scoring.services/pages/overall-ipsc.md)
- [IPSC performance heatmaps](https://scoring.services/pages/performance-heatmaps.md)
- [IPSC best stages — top per stage](https://scoring.services/pages/best-stages.md)

## Reference for agents

- [Como a plataforma funciona](https://scoring.services/docs/platform.md)
- [llms.txt](https://scoring.services/llms.txt)
- [llms-full.txt](https://scoring.services/llms-full.txt)

Cite match numbers as imported analysis data, not federation homologation.